« Lambda counting » : différence entre les versions

De Wiki du LAMA (UMR 5127)
Aller à la navigation Aller à la recherche
Aucun résumé des modifications
Ligne 37 : Ligne 37 :
(the proof of result of section k needs the result of section (k-1))
(the proof of result of section k needs the result of section (k-1))


=== upper and lower bounds for <math>L_n</math> ===
=== Upper and lower bounds for <math>L_n</math> ===


For the lower bound, we will first count the number <math>LB(n,k)</math> of lambda-terms of size <math>n</math> starting with <math>k</math> lambdas and having no other lambda below. This means that the lower part of the term is a binary tree of size <math>n-k</math> with
For the lower bound, we will first count the number <math>LB(n,k)</math> of lambda-terms of size <math>n</math> starting with <math>k</math> lambdas and having no other lambda below. This means that the lower part of the term is a binary tree of size <math>n-k</math> with

Version du 17 octobre 2008 à 13:44

Introduction

The question is: among programs, what is the probability of having a fixed property.

what kind of program : turing machines, cellular automata, combinatory logic, lambda calculus

what kind of properties : structural (for functional programs), behaviour (SN, weakly normalizable, ...

references to known results on : turing machines, cellular automata

we concentrate on combinatory logic, lambda calculus

combinatory logic

results on combinatory logic

Generality on lambda calculus

what kind of distribution ?

we look only for densities,

for that we need size.

different size for variables: zero, one, binary with optimal size, binary with fixed size, debruijn indices in unary...

we concentrate on the simple one : variable of size zero (probably similar for size one ) more later for other size

generating functions

this does not work (by now) because radius of convergence 0

no known results for the number of terms of size n (denoted )

our results

(the proof of result of section k needs the result of section (k-1))

Upper and lower bounds for

For the lower bound, we will first count the number of lambda-terms of size starting with lambdas and having no other lambda below. This means that the lower part of the term is a binary tree of size with possibility for each leaf.

upper and lower bounds for number of lambdas in a term of size n

Jakub's trik : at least 1 lambda in head position

at least lambdas in head position and number of lambdas in one path

Remark: (may be 4) can be done directly without 3))

each of the Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle o(\sqrt{n/\ln(n)})} head lambdas really bind "many" occurrences of the variable

every fixed closed term (including the identity !) does not appear in a random term (in fact we have much more than that)

comment : so different situation in combinatory logic and lambda calculus ; the coding uses a big size so need to count variables in a different way

Experiments

results of the experiments we have done

some experiments that have to be done : e.g. density of terms having Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle \lambda x.y} or big Omega pattern ...

to be done

Upper and lower bounds for with other size for variables especially one, binary with fixed size

Open questions and Future work

.....