« Lambda counting » : différence entre les versions

De Wiki du LAMA (UMR 5127)
Aller à la navigation Aller à la recherche
Ligne 55 : Ligne 55 :


<center><math>
<center><math>
\begin{array}{lcl}
A - \frac{f(A) - x}{f'(A)}
A - \frac{f(A) - x}{f'(A)}
&=& A + x \frac{\ln(\ln(x))}{\ln(x)} \frac{\ln(x)}{x(\ln(x) - \ln(\ln(x)) + 1)}\\
= A + x \frac{\ln(\ln(x))}{\ln(x)} \frac{\ln(x)}{x(\ln(x) - \ln(\ln(x)) + 1)}\\
&=& A + \frac{\ln(\ln(x))}{\ln(x) - \ln(\ln(x)) + 1}
= A + \frac{\ln(\ln(x))}{\ln(x) - \ln(\ln(x)) + 1}
\end{array}
</math></center>
</math></center>



Version du 18 octobre 2008 à 19:27

Introduction

The question is: among programs, what is the probability of having a fixed property.

what kind of program : turing machines, cellular automata, combinatory logic, lambda calculus

what kind of properties : structural (for functional programs), behaviour (SN, weakly normalizable, ...

references to known results on : turing machines, cellular automata

we concentrate on combinatory logic, lambda calculus

Lambert function, Catalan and Motzkin numbers

Catalan numbers

  •  : Catalan numbers

Usual equivalent: which is obtained using Strirling formula. However, using stirling series: , we get that for we have

Thus, using this and , we have:

for all but also for .

Motzkin numbers

  • Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle M(n,k)}

Lambert W function

The Lambert function Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle W(x)} is defined by the equation Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle x = W(x) e ^ {W(x)} } which has a unique solution in Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle \mathbb{R}} .

For Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle x \geq e} , we have which implies that near . To prove this, it is enough to remark that

This is not precise enough for our purpose. Using one step of the Newton method from , we can find a better upper bound for because is increasing and convex. This gives:

Indeed, if we define , we have and therefore, newton's method from gives a point at position:

Échec de l’analyse (erreur de syntaxe): {\displaystyle A - \frac{f(A) - x}{f'(A)} = A + x \frac{\ln(\ln(x))}{\ln(x)} \frac{\ln(x)}{x(\ln(x) - \ln(\ln(x)) + 1)}\\ = A + \frac{\ln(\ln(x))}{\ln(x) - \ln(\ln(x)) + 1} }

combinatory logic

results on combinatory logic

Generality on lambda calculus

what kind of distribution ?

we look only for densities,

for that we need size.

different size for variables: zero, one, binary with optimal size, binary with fixed size, debruijn indices in unary...

we concentrate on the simple one : variable of size zero (probably similar for size one ) more later for other size

generating functions

this does not work (by now) because radius of convergence 0

no known results for the number of terms of size n (denoted )

our results

(the proof of result of section k needs the result of section (k-1))

Upper and lower bounds for

For the lower bound, we will first count the number of lambda-terms of size starting with lambdas and having no other lambda below. This means that the lower part of the term is a binary tree of size with possibility for each leaf. Therefore we have:

And therefore, for , using our lower bound for and , we get:

with

Now, for fixed, we define (so ) and look for the maximum of this function. We have . Thus, is equivalent to . The Lambert function begin increasing this means that is equivalent to . Therefore, reaches a maximum for .

This means that reaches its maximum for fixed when is near to which is likely not to be an integer. However, there are at least integer between and . Indeed, using our inequalities on Lambert W function, we have:

NOT TRUE : NEEDS FIXING !!!

Thus, we get the following lowerbound for :

To simplify, using the fact that and taking Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle n} large enough, we have the following lowerbound:

Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle \#(L_n) \geq \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}\ln^2(n)}\left(\frac{4n}{\ln(n)}\right)^{n-\frac{n}{\ln(n)}}}

upper and lower bounds for number of lambdas in a term of size n

Jakub's trik : at least 1 lambda in head position

at least Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle o(\sqrt{n/\ln(n)})} lambdas in head position and number of lambdas in one path

Remark: (may be 4) can be done directly without 3))

each of the Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle o(\sqrt{n/\ln(n)})} head lambdas really bind "many" occurrences of the variable

every fixed closed term (including the identity !) does not appear in a random term (in fact we have much more than that)

comment : so different situation in combinatory logic and lambda calculus ; the coding uses a big size so need to count variables in a different way

Experiments

results of the experiments we have done

some experiments that have to be done : e.g. density of terms having Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle \lambda x.y} or big Omega pattern ...

to be done

Upper and lower bounds for Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle L_n} with other size for variables especially one, binary with fixed size

Open questions and Future work

.....