« Lambda counting » : différence entre les versions
Aucun résumé des modifications |
|||
Ligne 40 : | Ligne 40 : | ||
2) upper and lower bounds for number of lambdas in a term of size n |
2) upper and lower bounds for number of lambdas in a term of size n |
||
3) Jakub's trik : at least 1 lambda in head position |
|||
4) at least o(sqrt(n/Log(n))) lambdas in head position and number of lambdas in one path |
|||
5) each of the o(sqrt(n/Log(n))) head lambdas really bind "many" occurrences of the variable |
|||
6) every fixed closed term (including the identity !) does not appear in a random term (in fact we have mauch more than that) |
Version du 17 octobre 2008 à 12:23
Introduction
The question is: among programs, what is the probability of having a fixed property.
what kind of program : turing machines, cellular automata, combinatory logic, lambda calculus
what kind of proerties : structural (for functional programs), behaviour (SN, weakly normalizable, ...
references to known results on : turing machines, cellular automata
we concentrate on combinatory logic, lambda calculus
section 1
results on combinatory logic
section 2 lambda calculus
what kind of distribution ? we look densities,
for that we need size. different size for varibles: zero, one, debruijn indices in unary, binary, ...
we concentrate on the simple one : variable of size zero (probably similar for size one ) more later for other size
generating functions
this does not work (by now) because radius of convergence 0
no known results for the number of terms of size n (denoted L_n)
our results
(the proof of result number k needs the result number (k-1))
1) upper and lower bounds for L_n
2) upper and lower bounds for number of lambdas in a term of size n
3) Jakub's trik : at least 1 lambda in head position
4) at least o(sqrt(n/Log(n))) lambdas in head position and number of lambdas in one path
5) each of the o(sqrt(n/Log(n))) head lambdas really bind "many" occurrences of the variable
6) every fixed closed term (including the identity !) does not appear in a random term (in fact we have mauch more than that)