« Lambda counting » : différence entre les versions

De Wiki du LAMA (UMR 5127)
Aller à la navigation Aller à la recherche
Ligne 133 : Ligne 133 :
<center><math>\#(L_n) \leq M(n) \left(\frac{n+1}{W(e(n+1))}\right)^{n-\frac{n+1}{W(e(n+1))} + 1}</math></center>
<center><math>\#(L_n) \leq M(n) \left(\frac{n+1}{W(e(n+1))}\right)^{n-\frac{n+1}{W(e(n+1))} + 1}</math></center>


The ration between our upper bound and lower bound is equivalent (NEEDS FURTHER CHECKING) to
The ration between our upper bound and lower bound is equivalent to (NEEDS FURTHER CHECKING):


<center><math>\left(\frac{1}{4(3-2\sqrt{2})}\right)^n\frac{\ln^3(n)}{n^2} \simeq 1.46^n\frac{\ln^3(n)}{n^2}</math></center>
<center><math>\left(\frac{1}{4(3-2\sqrt{2})}\right)^n\frac{\ln^3(n)}{n^2} \simeq 1.46^n\frac{\ln^3(n)}{n^2}</math></center>

Version du 20 octobre 2008 à 12:06

Introduction

The question is: among programs, what is the probability of having a fixed property.

what kind of program : turing machines, cellular automata, combinatory logic, lambda calculus

what kind of properties : structural (for functional programs), behaviour (SN, weakly normalizable, ...

references to known results on : turing machines, cellular automata

we concentrate on combinatory logic, lambda calculus

Lambert function, Catalan and Motzkin numbers

Catalan numbers

  •  : Catalan numbers

Usual equivalent: which is obtained using Strirling formula. However, using stirling series: , we get that for we have

Thus, using this and , we have:

for all but also for .

Motzkin numbers

Let us define the number of unary-binary trees with inner nodes and leafs. We get

Then, by summing we define the number of unary-binary trees with inner nodes and give an equivalent:

Lambert W function

The Lambert function is defined by the equation which has a unique solution in .

For , we have which implies that near . To prove this, it is enough to remark that

This is not precise enough for our purpose. Using one step of the Newton method from , we can find a better upper bound for because is increasing and convex. This gives:

Indeed, if we define , we have and therefore, newton's method from gives a point at position:

Finally, we show that for , we have:

Indeed, for , we have , which implies and therefore .

combinatory logic

results on combinatory logic

Generality on lambda calculus

what kind of distribution ?

we look only for densities,

for that we need size.

different size for variables: zero, one, binary with optimal size, binary with fixed size, debruijn indices in unary...

we concentrate on the simple one : variable of size zero (probably similar for size one ) more later for other size

generating functions

this does not work (by now) because radius of convergence 0

no known results for the number of terms of size n (denoted )

our results

(the proof of result of section k needs the result of section (k-1))

Upper and lower bounds for

For the lower bound, we will first count the number of lambda-terms of size starting with lambdas and having no other lambda below. This means that the lower part of the term is a binary tree of size with possibility for each leaf. Therefore we have:

And therefore, for , using our lower bound for and , we get:

with

Now, for fixed, we define (so ) and look for the maximum of this function. We have . Thus, is equivalent to . The Lambert function begin increasing this means that is equivalent to . Therefore, reaches a maximum for .

This means that reaches its maximum for fixed when is near to which is likely not to be an integer. However, there are at least Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle \left\lfloor \frac{n (\ln(\ln(4en)) - 1)}{\ln^2(4en)}\right\rfloor} integer between Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle \frac{n+1}{W(4e(n+1))}} and Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle \frac{n+1}{\ln(4e(n+1))}} . Indeed, using our inequalities on Lambert W function, we have:

Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle \frac{n+1}{W(4e(n+1))}-\frac{n+1}{\ln(4e(n+1))} = \frac{(n+1) (\ln(4e(n+1)) - W(4e(n+1)))}{W(4e(n+1))\ln(4e(n+1))} \geq \frac{(n+1) (\ln(\ln(4e(n+1))) - 1)}{\ln^2(4e(n+1))}}

Thus, we get the following lowerbound for Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle L_n} :

Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle \#(L_n) \geq \sum_{k=1}^{n} LB(n,k) \geq \sum_{k=\lceil\frac{n+1}{\ln(4e(n+1))}\rceil}^{\lfloor\frac{n+1}{W(4e(n+1))}\rfloor} K \frac{(4k)^{n-k+1}}{(n+1)^\frac{3}{2}} \geq K \left\lfloor \frac{(n+1) (\ln(\ln(4e(n+1))) - 1)}{\ln^2(4e(n+1))}\right\rfloor \frac{\left(\frac{4(n+1)}{\ln(4e(n+1))}\right)^{n-\frac{n+1}{\ln(4e(n+1))}+1}}{(n+1)^\frac{3}{2}}}

To simplify, using the fact that Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle \lim_{n\to +\infty}\left(\frac{\ln(n)}{\ln(4en)}\right)^n = 0} and taking Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle n} large enough, we have the following lowerbound:

Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle \#(L_n) \geq \frac{\sqrt{n}}{\ln^3(n)}\left(\frac{4n}{\ln(n)}\right)^{n-\frac{n}{\ln(n)}}}

We now compute an upper bound Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle UB(n,k)} for the number of lambda-terms of size Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle n} with exactly Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle k} lambdas (that is with Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle n - k + 1} leaves using the Motzkin numbers and allowing any lambda to bind any variable (regardless of the real scope):

Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle UB(n,k) = M(n,n-k+1) k^{n-k+1}}

If we sum this for all possible Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle k} and get an upper bound of Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle k^{n-k+1}} using Lambert function as for the lower bound, we get the following upper bound for Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle L_n} :

Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle \#(L_n) \leq M(n) \left(\frac{n+1}{W(e(n+1))}\right)^{n-\frac{n+1}{W(e(n+1))} + 1}}

The ration between our upper bound and lower bound is equivalent to (NEEDS FURTHER CHECKING):

Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle \left(\frac{1}{4(3-2\sqrt{2})}\right)^n\frac{\ln^3(n)}{n^2} \simeq 1.46^n\frac{\ln^3(n)}{n^2}}

upper and lower bounds for number of lambdas in a term of size n

Jakub's trik : at least 1 lambda in head position

at least Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle o(\sqrt{n/\ln(n)})} lambdas in head position and number of lambdas in one path

Remark: (may be 4) can be done directly without 3))

each of the Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle o(\sqrt{n/\ln(n)})} head lambdas really bind "many" occurrences of the variable

every fixed closed term (including the identity !) does not appear in a random term (in fact we have much more than that)

comment : so different situation in combinatory logic and lambda calculus ; the coding uses a big size so need to count variables in a different way

Experiments

results of the experiments we have done

some experiments that have to be done : e.g. density of terms having Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle \lambda x.y} or big Omega pattern ...

to be done

Upper and lower bounds for Échec de l’analyse (SVG (MathML peut être activé via une extension du navigateur) : réponse non valide(« Math extension cannot connect to Restbase. ») du serveur « https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/ » :): {\displaystyle L_n} with other size for variables especially one, binary with fixed size

Open questions and Future work

.....